|
|
| Subject: to issabella (buffalo reply) |
|
|
|
i was reading your post about the email reply that you got from buffalo.
i got the same answer last week, what is interesting is that we have the same timelines.
also i noticed about 10 other cases like ours, where people have their AOR FROM JUNE TO AUGUST 2004, their IA/MEDICALS from february to april 2005 are still waiting for their PPR. while other guys who did their medicals after this period of time are getting their PPRs.
i dunno if the guys in BUFFALO, forgot about us ? they put our files on hold (knowing that our medicals will expire sooon ) ? or they are doing detailed security checks on evryone who applied in that time ?
it s kinda confusing and annoying at the same time ... it s just not fair at all.
[14-01-2006,22:50]
[***.159.105.143]
blahhh |
|
(in reply to: to issabella (buffalo reply))
What reply did you guys get, mine is almost the same like Issabella but lag behind one month.
I got "early 2006" again last week AGAIN, weird!!!!!
[15-01-2006,04:08]
[**.149.75.66]
Mountains |
(in reply to: to issabella (buffalo reply))
i got the following:
you will recieve a letter shortly
[15-01-2006,06:16]
[***.159.105.143]
blahhh |
(in reply to: to issabella (buffalo reply))
we applied in Oct. 2003 and not even lucky as you are, the answer from CIC: "We have requested background....unfortunately, we cannot respond to requests for the
status of your application before this information is received". The answer was 3 mothes ago.
It just shows, at least from my point of view, that there is no system in it, happens just randomly.
[15-01-2006,11:04]
[**.48.226.3]
hell |
(in reply to: to issabella (buffalo reply))
And the same unswer we recieved a week ago.
Nothing changes for us.
[15-01-2006,11:05]
[**.48.226.3]
hell |
blahh (in reply to: to issabella (buffalo reply))
sorry to knwo that happened to you, as a matter of fact I got the same " you will receive the letter shortly" reply. I have the still inprocess in my estatus.
All we can do is hope for the best good luck
[15-01-2006,11:19]
[**.50.20.212]
issabella |
(in reply to: to issabella (buffalo reply))
hell:
Do you mind telling which country are you from? Your background check has taken unusually long time.
[15-01-2006,12:10]
[**.70.95.204]
Kool |
(in reply to: to issabella (buffalo reply))
We are from Russia, but I don´t think it really matters, I believe that background checking is random anyway. it´s almost a year for as, but for our friends from Russia too, it took only 6 days (based on CAIPS).
:) Unpredictable absolutly. And the people from International student office agree with it, because they have a lot of examples than the people with exactly the same background from the same country, who applied almost simultaneously (students in Canada), had completely different processing times, the example I was given 18 months and 40 months, respectively.
:) lottery, practicaly
Waiting............
[15-01-2006,12:31]
[**.48.226.3]
hell |
(in reply to: to issabella (buffalo reply))
Hell, who said Background check is "random", I definitely don´t think so, because if they do like that, it is discrimination. Contact your local MP if you are an In-Canada applicant and ask them to find what is happening with your application. "Background check is random" even if an experienced says this, I wouldn´t believe.
Contact the MP immediately and ask what´s happening.
[15-01-2006,17:07]
[**.149.75.66]
Mountains |
(in reply to: to issabella (buffalo reply))
Mountains,
thank you for your suggestion, actually we are thinking what should we do next, at least to know, what´s going on, it does not look normal.
[15-01-2006,19:32]
[**.48.226.3]
hell |
(in reply to: to issabella (buffalo reply))
Though we can´t say for sure if backgournd check is carried out randomly, we can reasonably conclude from observation that it is not done on every single applicant. I am in no objection to the necessity of such step for the sake of Canada´s national interest, I do, however, feel the canadian government could have done better. It´s close to be inhumane in my eyes to leave applicants hang in the air, not knowing what happen, where their cases are heading and when they can expect an end.
[15-01-2006,20:26]
[***.193.18.205]
hwsgeo |
|
