|
|
| Subject: To Roy, Uniden: for your expert opinion |
|
|
|
I just read the relpy of Roy (copy below) which is consistent and logic.
"The issue in any marriage is it genuine. Trying to confirm the bone fides of a relationship is a nightmare. You may be viewed as someone who abused the system just to get into Canada and your second marriage is bogus and CIC may believe your receiving thousands of dollars for the second marriage.
Anna work real hard on proving your marriage is real. There is no wait time from the time you get your actual divorce to sponsor another but think how it will look on the forms if you got a divorce on Friday and married on Saturday. You will have to explain issues if you want them to waive an interview for hubby #2.
Roy
www.cvimmigration.com
ok ok, we are struggling and frustrated with CIC in our family applications only because we respect the queue by following the rules. However,I know of personal cases who are not following the rules but are doing well. Here is an example of a case I know of it step by step.
#) a lady got married to a Canadian when he was holidaying in her country. She gained PR by landing with him. Less than a year later, they filed for a divorce. While it is hard to challenge the bona fide of that particular marriage, one would never exclude the fact that the lady had an eye on Canada, giving the background of her impoverished, restricted home country. She did not divorce on Friday and got married the following Saturday as Roy mentioned above. I think she could have done this if the chance was there in her hand. Anyway, she met someone online later and this "someone" is from a very different country and background. He was illegal in USA, but I can´t be sure of the details of his illegality in US. Was it a simple "overstay" after a healthy legal visa entery, or was it for more serious reasons?. I do not know. All I know is that he is from a county and culture who are famous in fraudulent IDs. The man, all of sudden, arrived to Canada, they got married immedialy, got pregnant instantly, and they have a baby right now. He is not from a Visa waiver country. With all CIC regulations and rules, this man could not simply come to Canada under any immigration or visa process. He is still here with his wife and family, while we are still suffering from the long queue and bureaucracy of CIC. I have no jealousy of whatever reason. But while I am waiting and waiting in deep frustration, I could not find any explanation to those mysterious cases that are simply tolerated by CIC.
Any explanation?
Thanks.
[06-03-2007,12:36]
[**.109.24.62]
Anonymous## |
|
(in reply to: To Roy, Uniden: for your expert opinion)
Seems to me there is information you´re leaving out in an attempt to create a story of controversy. Even if this story is true, you say nothing here that would indicate that the person you speak of has received his PR visa. Just being in Canada, married to a Canadian and having a baby does not give him legal status in Canada. Considering your accusation that he was also in the USA illegally, if this is true - would it be such a big surprise to find him staying in Canada illegally, too? All who want to be legitimate residents of Canada "suffer the long queue and the bureaucracy of CIC". It´s an acceptable part of the process to be legit - if you resent it maybe you should choose another home. That said, the tone of your rant seems strangely familiar - as if it echoes voices emmanating from under other "bridges" on the WWW.
[06-03-2007,14:45]
[**.142.9.210]
oromum |
(in reply to: To Roy, Uniden: for your expert opinion)
142.9.210
This story is true and real. CIC are aware of the story and that is amazing part of it. I didn´t say the person has got his PR but he is not deported either.
Thank you anyway for taking time to answer.
[06-03-2007,15:35]
[**.109.59.55]
Anonymous## |
(in reply to: To Roy, Uniden: for your expert opinion)
You really twist the facts and omit the initial question.
WHAT LONG QUEUE?
MOST SPOUSAL SPONSORSHIPS ARE COMPLETED IN SIX MONTHS FROM MOST VISA POSTS.
THE QUESTION WAS SINCE HER FIRST MARRIAGE DID NOT WORK HOW LONG OF A WAIT IS REQUIRED BEFORE SUBMITTING ANOTHER SPONSORSHIP.
THE ANSWER WAS NO WAIT IS REQUIRED BUT PROVE YOUR RELATIONSHIP. TO BE DIVORCED IN CANADA ANY COUPLE HAS TO LIVE SEPERATE AND APART FOR A YEAR. CIC WILL NOT RECOGNIZE ANY DIVORCE UNLESS IT WAS ISSUED IN A COUNTRY WERE THE APPLICANTS NORMALLY RESIDE.
[06-03-2007,16:49]
[**.158.51.2]
Roy |
(in reply to: To Roy, Uniden: for your expert opinion)
Thanks Roy
There must be sort of misunderstanding. No twist intended. Our case is in Canada and has been going on for 16 monthss , with no end. I was not comparing your first original relpy "quoted above" to the story given. I was referring to the fortune and misfortune when CIC look into the bona fide of any individual relationship. But again the story I gave is real and very true.
[06-03-2007,17:30]
[**.109.59.55]
Anonymous## |
(in reply to: To Roy, Uniden: for your expert opinion)
I have had at least one couple come into my office that I thought their marriage/relationship was bogus and later learned it was not. I have had some come in that I thought were real to only learn later that they were bogus.
The difference is that a consultant was charged by the RCMP in Toronto for assisting with bogus marriages. He was immediately suspended by CSIC and his ten employees were out of a job. When the consultant finally got his day in court he was found not guilty.
Yet he is out of business, the employees and their families are without an income.
Lawyers on the other hand are never charged because they are protected by lawyer and client privilage.
I have won an inland marriage were the sponsor is 76 and his wife is 39 and they were interviewed. It took an awful lot of convincing to take them as a client.
Bogus marriage applicants have always been around. Possibly the officer looking at your file is the same as the cop that would give anyone a ticket for doing 108 kilometers an hour.
Tough luck.
Roy
www.cvimmigration.com
[07-03-2007,06:35]
[**.52.217.190]
Roy |
(in reply to: To Roy, Uniden: for your expert opinion)
Thanks Roy
I understand and agree. It is tough luck. But the point is: "CIC is tough with the people who are following the rules, waiting in the queue and accepting the tough or good luck outcome. At the same time CIC is allowing those who make the short cut into system and into Canada". That is where the frustration comes from.
[07-03-2007,12:15]
[**.109.15.118]
Anonymous## |
|
