Question to Balwant and others...part2

Canada Immigration Forum (discussion group)


 
       
Subject: Question to Balwant and others...part2
  Balwant,
Plz be patient and also read my last post #10 in the 1st thread.

Do you think this following part of the story is relevant: " wife who was still PR at the time of her last marriage, immigrated to Canada with her own dependent child , sponsored by her ex naturalized Canadian husband. NB her dependent child is from local ex ex husband. Relationship fell apart and divorce started as early as the first year of her arrival to Canada and almost 2 years before her marriage to the current husband. Would her first marriage to the Cnd citizen be over-looked or investigated by CIC?"

[22-10-2007,13:57]
[**.109.50.190]
SutarB
(in reply to: Question to Balwant and others...part2)
let me understand this... woman has 2 children, different fathers. 1st husband sponsored her. He is toast. Second husband is toast and she is sponsoring #3 who is in Canada without proper documentation or valid visa?


[22-10-2007,14:54]
[***.121.220.199]
Sharon
(in reply to: Question to Balwant and others...part2)
I missed some pertinent facts as you have described them

man #3 is in Canada claiming refugee status and they got married 2 weeks after he showed up in Canada.

Sutar, Sutar, Sutar, either this is the story from hell or you are creating quite a wild fantasy. Either way, I would hope CIC turns this drama inside out to figure out what the game is. Situations like this make family class sponsorships a nightmare for everyone.

[22-10-2007,15:02]
[***.121.220.199]
Sharon
(in reply to: Question to Balwant and others...part2)
sharon sharon sharon

No fantasy..no false stories. true story but only GOD knows small details.

First husband (the father of older dependent child who accompanied her mom has NEVER been to Canada, has nothing to do with any story but biological father of older kid) so ignore numbering him. The Cnd husband has NO kids from her and divorced. The third (current)is in mystery position. She was pregnant last we saw her. She must have had his baby by now. Does this make sense? any more expansion needed?

[22-10-2007,15:09]
[**.109.50.190]
SutarB
(in reply to: Question to Balwant and others...part2)
got it. what a mess. What is she doing for income?
[22-10-2007,16:09]
[***.121.220.199]
Sharon
(in reply to: Question to Balwant and others...part2)
As far as I know she is employed but may be in the minimum income range.

I am sure CIC and CBSA have recieved tips from the public and some investigations were carried out. This is for sure. But everything is confidetial due to the Privacy Act. What can be the outcome and the scenario?

NB: We, the group who are watching this game, believe that he might have applied initially for refugee. This is NOT known or confirmed (100%). But the only other option for him to come to Canada, can be what? SK is not one..other normal immigration schedules are excluded...so what can it be?

[22-10-2007,16:49]
[**.109.34.66]
SutarB
(in reply to: Question to Balwant and others...part2)
if I was the woman I would be very skeptical about it all. Pregnant - big deal. She would retain the child and he would likely walk away without a second thought so the pregnancy is not really a good measurement of dedication to a relationship. Fast marriage has got to be screaming ´caution´. she will be responsible for this guy for 3 years.

There are way to many reasons that this story screams fraud and who is the one that will get hurt - 2 children. Does not sound like this woman makes very good life choices.

If she sponsors him, I would think CIC is going to really test the relationship. If it remains with the refugee board I would think the whole thing might get dragged on and on.

Neither option is a good one.

[22-10-2007,17:06]
[***.121.220.199]
Sharon
(in reply to: Question to Balwant and others...part2)
"There are way to many reasons that this story screams fraud"...hmmm.sounds true.

I first and again assure those who started to feel bored that this is a real story. We are not sure even if he had applied for refugee status. It was just a guessing as this could be the ONLY available option to enter Canada through the normal channels after being illegal in US for long time. The other options could be NONE but fraud and you get it. (how common is the fraud BTW?. All we know is that his case was seen & reviewed by the top or head of Immigration of his province. Also the RCMP and CBSA were involved. Were they involved because of the warning from the public or what? we do not know. We also heard he was interviewed by CSIS.
So, is it fraud or refugee claim? which way is the likely path?


[22-10-2007,19:48]
[**.109.43.88]
SutarB
(in reply to: Question to Balwant and others...part2)
if those sorts of people are watching the case, they smell fraud. I don´t know what flags the authorities to get involved and if you are unsure about the refugee claim, we are doing a whole lot of speculation from very few pieces of information.

in my mind the refugee claim is also suspect so this guy sounds like bad news all around. Too bad the woman got herself tangled up in the mess and now there is a baby to pay the price. Sad.

[22-10-2007,21:13]
[***.121.220.199]
Sharon
(in reply to: Question to Balwant and others...part2)
I figure this is my golden moment... Sutar, I will believe your story if you finally believe mine. That includes DB too. Deal?
[22-10-2007,21:44]
[***.121.220.199]
Sharon
(in reply to: Question to Balwant and others...part2)
forgot to answer you other question... how common is fraud? we know that 15% (the number I recall hearing) of spousal sponsorships are fraudulent and we know that about 50% of refugee claims are turned down. We can assume some that were legitimate got refused but we can also assume that lots got through that were not. So, from my way of looking, there are some pretty good odds that there is some sort of trouble in paradise.
[22-10-2007,22:12]
[***.121.220.199]
Sharon


Canada Immigration | Forever Living Products in Canada