|
|
| Subject: NUMBERS 3 |
Hi All
Hey since I posted those numbers this morning soooo many postings. Would you like to see some questions by Immigration Officers as to policy?
Roy
www.cvimmigration.com
[14-11-2007,20:38]
[**.55.219.25]
Roy |
(in reply to: NUMBERS 3)
The Numbers came from Lexbase
Please read below the forum for CIC Officers.
?Misrepresentation:
How do you get the client out of Canada if they are here??
Nadine Gomm Regional Program Advisor to Rebecca Church CIC Vancouver Admissions January 22, 2007: ?In order
to pursue Enforcement action, you would have to write a 44 report yourself, using the evidence of the finding at the visa
office.?
Rebecca Church: ?In other words, I would have to send to a hearing for misrep to get the 2 year Exclusion??
Nadine Gomm Regional Program Advisor: ?Yes. The Exclusion Order under R.225(3) would then be issued, and the
two-year time clock on the "Exclusion" would start from the date that the Order is enforced. So, there is an
"Inadmissibility? of two years, with its own time clock, plus a possible "exclusion," with a separate time clock yet to start ticking. This makes it rather disadvantageous for the person concerned to prolong the time spent in Canada.?
Roy
www.cic.gc.ca
[14-11-2007,20:49]
[**.55.219.25]
Roy |
(in reply to: NUMBERS 3)
Check the numbers in the past!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
http://209.71.218.213/domino/reports.nsf/html/0003xe06.html
Then see that to complete 80% of all applicants from all visa posts now is 67 months.
Roy
www.cvimmigration.com
[14-11-2007,21:19]
[**.55.219.25]
Roy |
(in reply to: NUMBERS 3)
do you think those applications that were in 2002 limbo are skuing the data?
Paris is saying
Federal Skilled Workers and Business applicants:
For applications received in 2002, 2003, 2004: 48 to 60 months
For applications received in 2005: 36 to 48 months
For applications received in 2006: approximately 36 months
[14-11-2007,21:53]
[***.121.220.199]
Sharon |
(in reply to: NUMBERS 3)
The numbers were obtained by an access to information request.
Lexbase exclusive:
A list of the number of persons, identified by their citizenship, who wait in Canada?s overseas
immigration queue. This information has never been made public. The dramatic disclosure of Canada?s immigration queue of 641,828 persons is India?s domination of Canada?s immigration future: 167,754
Indian citizens have queued to come to Canada. The surprise: the Philippines! Canada?s new immigration upstart has downed China to ?third place? for top source
countries.
Until now, the overseas immigration queue was publicly identified only by the place of the immigration
application, but not the citizenship of the applicant. That way of reporting artificially magnified the European immigration flow to Canada. The top sixty source countries below have 582,016 persons in queue. Of those, 37,141 are European: Britain: 16,238 Russia: 5,240 Ukraine: 4,518 Romania: 2,930 Germany: 2,477 France: 1,942 Poland: 1,352
Bulgaria: 1,310 Netherlands: 1,134.
This means policymakers and Canadian marketing companies wanting to capture the newest market segments should pay closer attention to the growing Indo-Canadian and Filipino-Canadian communities.
Material obtained by Lexbase under the Access to Information Act. Internal CIC datarun is from September 29, 2006
Roy
www.cvimmigration.com
[15-11-2007,07:46]
[**.52.218.199]
Roy |
(in reply to: NUMBERS 3)
wow, citizenship rather than numbers by consulate. That is going to ruffle some feathers as it will be viewed as a very significant shift in culture.
[15-11-2007,13:50]
[***.121.220.199]
Sharon |
(in reply to: NUMBERS 3)
Once again, I don´t know if I should say the US Immigration scores over Canada.... but in US they have restrictions on the quota system by country of citizenship. We can probably have another debate about which one is better, but if the Canadian approach is the better one, then it should not ruffle any feathers, it should be praised !
[15-11-2007,14:29]
[***.242.242.2]
Raj |
(in reply to: NUMBERS 3)
there are 2 concerns - what is happening to those economies with that many ´brightest and best´ wanting to leave.
second concern is the delicate balance we enjoy in Canada that involves enless cultures all having a place and a significance in our society. If one dominates in a significant way... what happens to the rest of society?
[16-11-2007,15:24]
[***.121.220.199]
Sharon |
|
