|
|
| Subject: wannabe... are you drowning in snow? |
|
|
|
I just saw a photo of snow to the hood of a car. yikes. hope you guys are OK.
I have been listening to CNN and apparently Hillary may have a new strategy. I am wondering if it will backfire. ´I will choose Obama as my VP so we can have a dream team so don´t worry... vote for me and you will get both of us.´
Pretty smart. Now I wonder how many people will see it the way I do. ´Bribery´. If you bash someone for almost a year and suggest he is not ready to serve the country, how can you suggest he is worthy of being selected as second in command???
go figure.
[10-03-2008,02:18]
[**.155.160.37]
Sharon |
|
(in reply to: wannabe... are you drowning in snow?)
BASH!
BASH some one for almost a year, come on Sharon they are both democrats. There are differences which both sides try to portray but BASH, BRIBERY!
When Hillary uses an intelligent move that would probably surely give the Democrats the White House its BRIBERY!
Its one thing to suggest he is not ready today but no reason to offer him a position so that he can gain more experience.
BASH, BRIBERY you have been in the hot sun too long.
Roy
www.cvimmigration.com
[10-03-2008,08:28]
[**.52.219.224]
Roy |
(in reply to: wannabe... are you drowning in snow?)
Thanks for thinking of us, Sharon. Yep, we are buried under 20 inches of snow, a record amount here. Saturday was wonderful; it snowed so hard we could barely see the houses behind our alley. Thankfully we had the whole weekend to stay in and play: lots of sledding, snow fort building and snowshoeing around the neighborhood (and, of course, digging out!). Love it!
Yes, Clinton´s newest idea is completely transparent. It is obviously self serving and senseless, and I can´t imagine any Obama supporter falling for it. There is a reason so many people like Obama, and none of it has to do with her. She underestimates how much she is disliked,and the more she plays games out of the Republican handbook, the more that dislike will grow. Obama needs to distance himself from this and show it for what it really is.
Roy: they may both be Democrats, but that doesn´t mean she isn´t being nasty and divisive. She´s missed the boat on trying to unite the Democratic party, and it´s only getting uglier. She must be the Republican party´s dream right now.
Have you seen that the girl in the "3 am" commercial is actually an Obama supporter? The footage of her was stock footage, and apparently used without her permission (like she wouldn´t notice?!).
[10-03-2008,09:47]
[**.24.116.196]
wannabecanadian |
(in reply to: wannabe... are you drowning in snow?)
LOL, remember that the next time someone wants to take pictures of your kids. You sign that waiver and it could end up in a McCain ad! I bet they won´t do that again!!!!
I bet the ad agency is pretty red in the face. How were they to know. Stock photo.
[10-03-2008,13:16]
[**.155.160.37]
Sharon |
(in reply to: wannabe... are you drowning in snow?)
This morning I read that she is now 17 and very involved in the Obama campaign. She´s actually a caucus leader! She´s taking it well, though.
[10-03-2008,17:56]
[**.24.116.196]
wannabecanadian |
(in reply to: wannabe... are you drowning in snow?)
I did not realize she was now an adult. that is even more embarassing!
[10-03-2008,18:14]
[**.155.160.37]
Sharon |
(in reply to: wannabe... are you drowning in snow?)
So an advertisement agency charged the soon to be (possibly) President of the USA a huge amount for an advertisement with a kid in it.
They agency was on a rush basis and used what ever they had in their stock of video images, good for them. If the advertisement was not effective no one would have researched who the kid was.
****************************
Now for the other side the Obama campaign used the comment
If Barack is not fit to lead why would Hillary pick him for the President in waiting position and that position would have to be ready at any time if she kicked the bucket.
That is by far a much better arguement.
Roy
www.cvimmigration.com
[10-03-2008,19:44]
[**.55.217.53]
Roy |
(in reply to: wannabe... are you drowning in snow?)
the photo issue is simply embarassing bad luck. what are the odds?
[10-03-2008,20:23]
[**.155.160.37]
Sharon |
(in reply to: wannabe... are you drowning in snow?)
Roy: the bigger argument is why would someone running for President want to become Vice President? Particularly when he has won more states, more electoral votes, and more of the popular votes? You clearly have your reasons for favoring Clinton, but you have to admit this makes no sense whatsoever.
[10-03-2008,21:04]
[**.24.116.196]
wannabecanadian |
(in reply to: wannabe... are you drowning in snow?)
In the US primaries the leading candidates normally find other candidates with slightly different positions. Like McCain who is not that religious hooking up with Huckaby or others from the religious right.
The issue is neither can actually win so the race is far from over. Like the fat lady has not sung yet. Either can trip and fall flat on their face and the press is only beginning to look at Obama.
Ask that same question after Pittsburgh and if Florida runs a make up primary in late June.
Every time your in a race do you quit before the finish line just because your ahead or behind.
Hillary does not come across as a quitter. Obama is more likely to trip and fall on his face more so then her.
Roy
www.cvimmigration.com
[11-03-2008,09:00]
[**.52.216.6]
Roy |
(in reply to: wannabe... are you drowning in snow?)
Roy, don´t you wish Canadian politics was this exciting??
Canada would be happy with any one of them!
[11-03-2008,14:27]
[**.155.160.37]
Sharon |
