|
|
| Subject: to Mike |
you may wish to apologize to Raj. You intellect comments were totally uncalled for. That is twice in the last 24 hours you have crossed the civility line.
If you want respect you need to show respect. Now, grow up.
[23-04-2008,18:11]
[***.20.119.10]
Sharon |
(in reply to: to Mike)
Sharon, thanks for speaking up for me, but I assure you that if I (or for that matter, anyone else) take each and every word written here very seriously then I´ll have huge problems in life.... LOL.
I´m doing exactly what Mike advised me to do.... chilling out !! and I apologize in advance if I gave the impression that I took offense to Mike´s comments.... regardless Sharon, I think Obama will edge Clinton in Indiana, much to Roy´s chagrin.... did you know that in Indiana even 17 yr olds can vote as long as they turn 18 before or on the date of general election ?? I did not know that, I knew they could enlist in the army, but.... !!
[23-04-2008,18:44]
[***.242.242.2]
Raj |
(in reply to: to Mike)
I think Mike´s comments were out of line and sounded to me borderline racist. With comment "your name clearly represents your mental level", I also think an apology is in order. Has nothing to do with chilling out.
Back to interesting politics, I also agree with Raj that Obama is likely to tip Indiana (altho maybe wishful thinking!). The part that bothers me until this is all decided, is the McCain-like public image damage Hillary is inflicting on Obama. She´s doing the work of the Republican Party and they´re quite happy with the service.
[23-04-2008,19:18]
[**.53.224.249]
Richard |
(in reply to: to Mike)
I´m not an Indian but know many famous guys who are well known in the entire world with "Raj". Can´t understand how name can show someone´s intellect level. Mike at least should explain us a bit.
it is a very bad news for the democrat camp that polls reveal that Hillary supporters won´t vote for Obama. can´t understand why. So far making offensive/aggressive comments Hillary is ahead.
[23-04-2008,19:32]
[***.219.255.152]
DC |
(in reply to: to Mike)
Ms. Sharon, You do not have to interfere in a matter which has no concern to you. I do not think i have to apologize Raj for any thing. He was accusing me and Roy both, and he was trying to tell others that Roy and Mike both are one person. I dont have any problem with his stament but he DID NOT even realize that he is ruining somebody´s career by simply posting such comments. Why would Roy become mike and post messages and why would i become Roy. Everybody on this forum knows that we are two different persons. He could have said that we agree upon many things but it does not mean that he should start accusing and ruin his career. Roy does not solicit on this forum but it does not mean that he is out of business and anyone can say anything and relate two stranger. May be i had gone too far in praising Roy thats why he got this impression but if you are a sensible person you need realize that your simple comments can have negitive impact on somebody´s career. You can do whatever you want to do with Roy but i would not allow anybody to relate him to me and vice versa and destroy his reputation. NEVER.
And you Sharon you must not comment before getting all the deatils. Please find somebody else and leave me alone. I do not want to argue with you because i do not like to argu with people who do not even know what they are talking about.
I assume Raj is a decent person but he must accept that he made a mistake. If he accepts his mistake, i apologize with all of my heart.
[23-04-2008,21:14]
[**.251.73.156]
Mike |
(in reply to: to Mike)
Ms. Sharon, Please do not teach me what civility line is and how many times i have crossed it. If you think you have something to say about my comments on gays and lesbian marraige thing. Go to the post and post your comments and i shall reply you there. If i and Raj have any misunderstanding, we can resolve it because we both know how to post something on this forum. Do not try to become an advocate of Raj and pretend that you are very civilized person, which you are not. You better grow up because you are a mature lady (i don´t know for real) and i am only 21. Get a life babeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!
[23-04-2008,21:22]
[**.251.73.156]
Mike |
(in reply to: to Mike)
DC,
You´re absolutely right. It´s not good news that a large number of Hillary supporters are saying they won´t vote for Obama if he gets the nomination.
But we can trace the reason. Hillary has been so aggressive in criticizing Obama´s personal character, abilities, and judgment that it´s deeply affected her supporters. This is unfortunate, especially for a fellow Democrat and the Party.
[23-04-2008,22:47]
[**.53.224.249]
Richard |
(in reply to: to Mike)
Mike, at 21 you have a lot to learn and the sooner you start, the better off you will be. Read the rules of this forum - and try to follow them.
[23-04-2008,23:26]
[**.155.160.37]
Sharon |
(in reply to: to Mike)
Come on Sharon, please no more. You are opening a new topic for discussion and i am not in the mood. I am 21, not a todler so please hands off.............i request you.
[23-04-2008,23:45]
[**.251.73.156]
Mike |
(in reply to: to Mike)
then don´t act like a todler.
[23-04-2008,23:56]
[**.155.160.37]
Sharon |
(in reply to: to Mike)
Mike, Mike, Mike.... STOP !!!
If my acceptance will stop your insanity.... then ok, I accept my mistake.... don´t even bother apologizing..... you seem to be an intelligent person.... now lets move on to something interesting....
I agree with the opinion that the public mudslinging and brickbat´s thrown by the Democrats may come to haunt them big time come year end. To be fair to Hillary though, I must admit that the race is too close to really ask her to step down (inspite of what her views are on the hot election topics), I mean if it were say a spread of 4-500 delegates, then maybe the party as a whole may have pressurized her into a withdrawal of candidacy. This is unprecedented and exciting, and the other angle I am reading is that because its a close fight more and more Democrats are going to vote.... which is a good sign as far as the general elections are concerned because inspite of trading threats that ones supporters may not vote for the other in general the turnout maybe more election time which might favor the Democrats..... any thoughts ????
[24-04-2008,00:25]
[**.112.73.220]
Raj |
|
