|
|
| Subject: what do you think CIC should do? |
|
|
|
twice today we have been asked about residency requirements for PNP programs. In both cases they have no intention on staying in the province that allowed them to go to the front of the waiting line. In both cases they have some kind of attraction to Ontario. It better be for a girl because employment opportunities are drying up in Ontario.
What should the rule be - given that many of you are being honest and are standing in the general line up waiting patiently for your turn. Should there be a 1 year requirement... if people do not land and reside where they say they will - should CIC revoke their PR?
curious what you all think.
[24-11-2008,19:29]
[***.20.116.15]
Sharon |
|
(in reply to: what do you think CIC should do?)
ITS not CIC job , The provinces asked CIC to let them pick immigrant by their own criteria.
in Quebec if you don t hold CSQ you ll have no health care ,no public school,basicly no provincial services.
i was last time in quebec immigration office building and in the waiting room full of immigrant coming from other provinces asking for csq ,i could hear the receptionist saying that they will recieve it normally in 15 days.
back in 2003 quebec ifficially complained that manitoba is atrackting quebec immigrant, so the the move is made in all directions. and provinces welcome the immigrants who move in, and don t like when they move out.
the eternel debate ,who s first ,the egg or the chicken??
by the way norwagian researcher found the solution, its the egg who came first..its all about cromosom
[24-11-2008,20:31]
[**.221.20.228]
Mtl |
(in reply to: what do you think CIC should do?)
When one wants the best of both worlds they should be denied both.
The real problem has been around since 1998 when the Visa Officers were required to interview all offshore applicants which amounted to 48% of all applicants. Hence Regulation 11 and 60+ months of processing for FSW.
Roy
www.cvimmigration.com
[24-11-2008,21:16]
[**.52.219.42]
Roy |
(in reply to: what do you think CIC should do?)
CIC wont find a solution to something that its not considered a probleme.people who get PR through PNP and changing province are representing a few minority .
CIC care more about bogus mariages because those kind of mariages challange the systeme integrity, so that s the real probleme,because through love couples they are not necessairly those who accumulate evidences to proof comunlife.
if you move to your boyfriend house after marry him ,would you realy care to add your name in the phone bill???
[24-11-2008,22:55]
[**.221.20.228]
MTL |
(in reply to: what do you think CIC should do?)
Misrepresentation is Misrepresentation!
It does not matter if you LIED to obtain Permanent Residency through Convention Refugee Status, FSW Status, Spousal Sponsorship Status or a PNP certificate etc. its wrong because you lied.
As I was quoted in the Globe and Mail it is easier to prove a bogus marriage if you have money then to prove a genuine marriage if your poor. Marriages fail for so many logical reasons and just (one logical reason) is enough to stop any investigation into misrepresentation allegations based on a spousal sponsorship.
For CBSA or CIC to prove any holder of any PNP certificate had no intention of residing in said province would be far easier then to prove why a marriage started down the road to failure two months after the applicant arrives in Canada.
Any East Coast Province should never issue a PNP certificate to someone who has the majority of their family members residing in B.C. or vice versa.
What gets me is Saskatchewan is the only province expected to have a good growth rate next year and posters here do not want to take advantage of a booming economy!!!
I feel strongly that PNP applicants should be required to report to their Provincial Governments office at least once a month to show how they are establishing themselves.
Paper screening is too easy to beat. Have someone take money in and out of an account by debit card, cell phone bills, cable TV bills or a lease does not prove residency.
If you want into Canada in under a year as a PNP instead of waiting six years I believe reporting 24 times in person over two years seems fair to me.
Roy
http://www.cvimmigration.com/index_cn.html
[25-11-2008,09:02]
[**.52.216.152]
Roy |
what do you think CIC should do (in reply to: what do you think CIC should do?)
What is rong with you people Canada is fre country the new emigrant can billd there lifes where they like QC,BC,ON ect,because somebody apply in quebec he/she should die in quebec oo come on
[25-11-2008,15:10]
[***.236.128.62]
stavrimacoku |
(in reply to: what do you think CIC should do?)
The issue here is getting into the country on false pretenses. If you are here illegally, you have already shown that you don´t have respect for the immigration rules here as you feel you are above them and able to stay despite the fact that it is AGAINST THE LAW.
With the PNP, the motivation for this is to allow growth in specific areas of Canada. That said, to use this province only to move to another part of the country defeats the purpose of this program. I am not saying that you need to stay there forever, but there should be some sort of accountability of the immigrant to that province so that the province gets the benefit they are seeking by requesting that people immigrate to their area.
Stavrimacoku ~ you seem to be very quick to judge others saying that we are not welcoming. I think you fail to recognize that you are the one who has broken the rules, not me, not Roy, so why should we embrace you into the country if you feel that you are ENTITLED to be here because you broke the LAW??? I live in one of the most multicultural cities in Canada. I do not have issue with people coming to make a better life in Canada. I do have issue with people such as yourself who feel that you have entitlement to remain here in the country after breaking the LAW. If I were to break the law in your country, should I have all the same rights as a law abiding citizen or should I go to jail or pay a fine??? I think you are unable to see other perspectives based on your current situation. Do the paperwork, become legal and stop expecting this country to provide you with benefits after you chose to break our laws.
[25-11-2008,16:41]
[**.156.10.157]
Carrie |
(in reply to: what do you think CIC should do?)
Stavrimacoku or.......
The next time you have been waiting in line for twenty hours for some tickets that you really want and twenty people cut in front of you just when your in site of the ticket booth and then the event is sold out come back here and talk about rules.
I was going to give other examples but decided it is not worth it.
Roy
www.cvimmigration.com
[26-11-2008,11:34]
[**.52.219.181]
Roy |
(in reply to: what do you think CIC should do?)
I am just wondering... How come that people who cannot immigrate to Canada by FSW program (because their English is not good enough or because thier occupation is excluded from "list of 29") so easy can find job and move to any province from, let´s say, Quebec?
Why is it so necessary to cut them from possibility to come with honest intent and instead force them to look for tortuous ways?
[27-07-2010,23:34]
[***.6.74.22]
Sarah Margaret FERGUSON |
(in reply to: what do you think CIC should do?)
Sarah, you are misunderstanding - the PNP program is regional specific rather than national specific. Sometimes a certain part of the country has opportunities or needs that do not exist elsewhere - hence the PNP program. If you can find your own job and your own fit... should that not move you closer to the front of the line?
Quebec is looking for people that will promote their culture and are willing to offer preferential treatment to those who speak french. At one point they were the only province to have a PNP program but that has now changed.
[28-07-2010,10:43]
[**.154.245.217]
Sharon |
