Roy

Canada Immigration Forum (discussion group)


 
       
Subject: Roy
  You said in one of your postings that a very well known "ethnic" group adviced a man not to declare when he was making a good income whie living with a highly educated canadian woman. If he was violating the law and working illegaly,CIC will not be happy with that. You made the Old Lady Assumption that CIC would not believe that a highly educated canadian woman would marry a bum like him. Well, It seems that you are giving him the wrong advice to make his case longer so you can make more money out of him.
The wasy that a ´highly educated´ woman runs her life is none of CIC bussiness. If they show proof of a commited relationship that should be more than enough, even when canadian older people marry very young people , though CIC makes their cases longer, canadians have the right to bring a spouse. Unlesss you do have a complicated case , I would say. yes hire legal advice but if you do not, do not give them your money for nothing.
I have quiate a few friends who were being charged 500 dollars just to renew a visitors visa, I helped them to fil out their forms for a a case of beer and they were approved. How´s that Mr. Roy?

[14-07-2010,11:52]
[***.6.233.232]
Vitorelli
Sharon I beg you a pardon (in reply to: Roy)
I beg you a pardon for my quick trashy spelling but I have 7 languages in my head so at times, my mistakes are made our of having too much info in my head and some other times I just type quickly, but our corrections are welcome, since you have HONORS in English.
BTW, other than English do you at least are fluent in the Second Official languag of your country?

[14-07-2010,11:56]
[***.6.233.232]
Vitorelli
(in reply to: Roy)
In Canada, we call it "honour".

Just for your information.

[14-07-2010,12:15]
[**.233.201.58]
Anonymous
(in reply to: Roy)
I am the one with honours in english - not Roy.

You have never asked me for my various language proficiencies and I have not told you - because the question is not relevant. Other people I know that have multiple languages have problems with word order - you don´t. I would bet money based on your vocabulary and word patterns that english is your first language.

So forgive me if I am skeptical about your claim - besides - who cares?

If your language skills were better, you would have carefully read Roy´s comment and understood that the older woman- younger man issue is relative to the cultural norms of the country they are coming from. Marrying outside one´s religion, multi racial marriages, same sex marriages, older woman marriages are not uncommon in Canada - but they certainly are in other places. CIC always looks at the relationship in the context of where the foreign applicant is from to determine how much of a stretch the Canadian marriage actually is. If it raises questions - well, there is some significant proof that needs to offset those questions. If the foreign applicant has the ability to enter Canada on their own merits, then the family class application is viewed differently again because the Canadian is not really ´needed´ to get the PR designation.

So you see, family class applications are not a clear, straight forward exercise and if you are not careful, precise, complete, and exhaustive - you get buried in CIC queries that can result in the file taking forever or worse- being denied. Applicants need to assume CIC will say no rather than yes and work from that perspective.

It is not rocket science but it is also amazing how many people mess it up.

[14-07-2010,14:51]
[**.154.245.217]
Sharon
(in reply to: Roy)
Vitorelli

Common Sense has to prevail. No one would let another person in today´s two family income environment to allow their partner especially a MAN to live off them for seven years. Wrong advice lol he is Landed.

The logic behind the (how) anyone lives their life when they are sponsoring their spouse is extremely important. Why did you marry him is a very logical question when he has not been working for seven years!

Can you not understand that????

What proof of a committed relationship can they show if he has not been contributing and spending all his time watching Oprah and Judge Judy all day long?

Canadian´s have NO right to bring a spouse unless they can PROVE they are in a genuine relationship (or) that they never entered into the relationship to obtain a benefit under the Act!

So the case of beer means you broke the Law. You were paid! They did not get caught when they paid you lucky for them.

Lets say they get asked if they paid someone and your name pops up. A case of Beer or $10,000.00 it does not make a difference it cost them something for your assistance.

They have violated the Act and her partner will be found inadmissible. Way to go Vitorelli you just ruined a real couples future life together due to your excessive consumption of Ale!

Shame on you.

Roy
cvimmigration.com


[14-07-2010,16:52]
[**.229.193.154]
Anonymous
Believe it or not (in reply to: Roy)
Believe it or not was true. I help people if I can and they just take me for dinner. I save them thousands of dollars. I save them from crows like you.
As per you Sharon you are just another ANGLO Monolingual Moron.

[18-07-2010,03:31]
[***.6.233.232]
Vitorelli
(in reply to: Roy)
Anglo Monolingual Moron? too funny.
[18-07-2010,13:43]
[**.154.245.217]
Sharon
Reply to the Roy posting
Submission Code (SX18205) Copy The Code From The Left found in the brackets
Name
Email
Reply Subject
Reply Message


Canada Immigration | Forever Living Products in Canada