Finally win this H&C case

Canada Immigration Forum (discussion group)


 
       
Subject: Finally win this H&C case
  To All

The title is wrong but the video explains everything.

The One Child Policy in China is sooooo wrong. CIC transferred the file on October 15 2005 to the PRRA unit and never sought submissions until November of 2010.

Then the PRRA Unit took 12 months to deal with the file.

Best quality family I know!

http://www.torontosun.com/2011/10/05/chinese-family-granted-refugee-status

Roy
cvimmigration.com

[07-10-2011,11:52]
[**.70.66.64]
Roy
CONGRATA (in reply to: Finally win this H&C case)
The adult Chens, father and mother, were approved in principle in their H&C application along with their PRRA.

They are protected persons in Canada until they are landed as permanent resident in Canada, having to go through medical exams, police certificate, and paying landing fees as well as photos and passports at the final landing interview at a local immigration office.

[07-10-2011,12:08]
[**.232.244.253]
Anonymous
(in reply to: Finally win this H&C case)
The issue is Chinese have huge population and they MUST control it so it becomes manageable. On the other hand, Canadian population is in decline so they need to import pre-made people, hopefully trained too, to keep the society rolling. This gives the diametrically opposite attitudes. You should not criticize China´s policy, unless you are willing to finance their increasing needs. China is amused by the Canadian position and its inability to produce more children, but they do not criticize Canada´s policy or attitudes. It is time for Canada to reciprocate the goodwill. We all know that we could enjoy tremendous amounts of loving without conceiving; the Chinese women need to learn about birth control and go right on ahead and enjoy loving...
[07-10-2011,12:40]
[***.202.41.187]
Lulz
(in reply to: Finally win this H&C case)
Well done Roy. No one can understand the hardship of all this process other than the one who suffers! Good to hear that they are approved. Mine took 13 years for this approval.
[07-10-2011,15:04]
[**.56.254.5]
Haji
(in reply to: Finally win this H&C case)
WOW as soon as the EPOCH Times comes out someone supports a communist government who forces men to have vasectomy and sterilizes women for having one above quota child.

Putting a fine of $35,000.00 for one above quota and firing a professor who only makes 35K is cruel punishment to me.

Roy
cvimmigration.com

[08-10-2011,06:25]
[***.206.5.159]
Roy
(in reply to: Finally win this H&C case)
That means everyone in China is eligible. I have to spread the news to every chinese I know and soon Canada will be just another Chinese Province :)
[08-10-2011,12:27]
[**.247.210.96]
SG
(in reply to: Finally win this H&C case)
So they have more children after getting to Canada so they could play the system!

Sorry but send them home!

[08-10-2011,13:59]
[***.247.185.242]
Pete
(in reply to: Finally win this H&C case)
But but but Roy was saying "The One Child Policy in China is sooooo wrong"

[08-10-2011,17:05]
[**.247.210.96]
Anonymous
(in reply to: Finally win this H&C case)
SUPER NEW TROLLS.

Fun time!

Compassion has to be common sense.

SG aka Anonymous ***.247.210.96 you are showing your lack of knowledge!

Every H&C application is based on its own particular sets of circumstances. It is not case Law.

The issue here is take the kids with you or leave them behind. I would not call a 13 year old a anchor baby.

China signed the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child which clearly states they are to provide state funded education to their citizens. If a Chinese family moves for work from one province or city to another they must leave their children behind or pay foreign student fees so their kids can go to school.

Imagine moving to BC from Ontario and having to leave your children behind.

They will not cover the costs of Canadian children attending school.

I submitted an H&C application on their behalf in May of 2004.

At 19:30 hrs 7:30 p.m. on Oct. 15th CIC called the father on a Blocked Number. He answered a bunch of questions then got nervous and hung up.

CIC Officer then transferred the file to the PRRA unit where it sat for SIX YEARS with no action. That is what CIC calls Prompt Processing A 3 (1) (f)

They have had a prolonged stay due to CIC. The parents have been here for fifteen years.

The family are heavily involved in community activities. The father has been working two jobs. The Mother is working. They were never, ever on social assistance. They bought a condo and paid a down payment at 80% of the purchase price.

****Pete SO you think the One Child Policy is a Good thing. Go there and let them hold you down while they go SNIP, SNIP!

Aborting a fetus forcefully at eight months which the Chinese authorities do is NOT sooooo wrong?

So this loving couple should have never had a second child get real.

The Federal Court of Canada established the Best Interest of the Child based on Mavis Baker decision.

I APPLAUD THE CIC OFFICER THAT APPROVED THIS HARD WORKING FAMILY AND SAID THAT THEIR 15 YEAR OLD DAUGHTER WHO THE FATHER HAS NOT HUGGED IN ALL THAT TIME SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO COME TO CANADA.

He is back......trolls

Roy
cvimmigration.com

[09-10-2011,09:10]
[***.254.173.80]
Roy
(in reply to: Finally win this H&C case)
I am not saying one child policy is a good thing but on the other hand, I would not have children if I do not have the means to bring them up. May sound cruel to you but have you see how african´s children suffer? child labor, prostitution etc etc.
China current population is about 1,339,724,852. Maybe you can help me to calculate how much money is needed to provide education, healthcare etc etc. Do you think the China government want to implement this hugely unpopular policy if they have a choice? Again simply man with a narrow tunnel vision....

How is Chen family´s situation different from billions of other chinese family situation? There are millions of chinese family leaving apart from each other just so to survive.

I am not against immigration by the way - but I would like the government to consider the number carefully - think whether our healthcare and other services are able to cope with the increase population!! DO NOT INCREASE IMMIGRATION FOR THE SAKE OF GDP!! THAT IS IRRESPONSIBLE!!!

[09-10-2011,11:52]
[**.247.210.96]
SG
(in reply to: Finally win this H&C case)
No kids unless a legal status.

Do not be an author of one´s own misfortune.

[10-10-2011,11:16]
[**.232.244.253]
Anonymous