|
|
| Subject: Schulich's selectivity is crap |
Let´s look at Schulich´s selectivity at the graduate level (MBA)...
My friend got into Schulich for a MBA but got rejected from Rotman (UofT), Ivey (Western), and Sauders (UBC).
Queen´s has the highest entrance GMAT, with around 670. UofT follows with around 665, then Western at around 664. York is at 650.
Queen´s selectivity is around 30%, UofT 33%, Western 35%. And York is 55%.
(taken from BusinessWeek - York doesn´t rank very well on here by the way)
Despite the fact that Rotmans (UofT) has a much larger entering class than Schulich, the quality of incoming students at Schulich is still much lower.
And graduating students at Rotmans are paid on average $20k higher (Financial Times).
...
[03-05-2006,15:25]
Anonymous |
(in reply to: Schulich's selectivity is crap)
meh
[03-05-2006,18:02]
Anonymous |
(in reply to: Schulich's selectivity is crap)
Even Nipissing is more selective!!!
[03-05-2006,21:34]
Anonymous |
(in reply to: Schulich's selectivity is crap)
Good Students not neccessarily make a good business school.
If the data above is true and correct, then York´s faculty and all other resources and equipments are among the best in the world. It maybe better than Harvard too.
[04-05-2006,00:59]
Anonymous |
(in reply to: Schulich's selectivity is crap)
"the fact that Rotmans (UofT) has a much larger entering class than Schulich"
I doubt this because York´s Schulich has the largest graduate business school in Canada.
[04-05-2006,01:01]
Anonymous |
|
