Seneca > Harvard

Canadian Universities Forum (discussion group)


 
 
Subject: Seneca > Harvard
So true! ive been accepted to both and im going to choose seneca because it has a better rep in my opinion
[22-07-2006,18:14]
Anonymous
(in reply to: Seneca > Harvard)
lmfao
[22-07-2006,19:01]
Anonymous
(in reply to: Seneca > Harvard)
Seneca = lower graduation rates so obviously a better school, duh
[22-07-2006,19:23]
Anonymous
(in reply to: Seneca > Harvard)
now your just being silly, senca tuition is like $2000 and harvard tuition is probly $30,000 per year so obvuiously we know the harvard student is going to be trying his best and the senica student is going to be messing around.

On the other hand, tuition to UofT is the same as tuition to ryerson, you have no excuse buddy.

[22-07-2006,19:41]
Anonymous
(in reply to: Seneca > Harvard)
ryerson western laurentian, lakehead and ottawa all kill UofT as far as engineering goes
[22-07-2006,20:04]
Anonymous
(in reply to: Seneca > Harvard)
And I guess your opinion is better than the gourman report?

http://www.eng.mcmaster.ca/gourman/ranking/engineering.html

[22-07-2006,20:20]
Anonymous
(in reply to: Seneca > Harvard)
the ogorman report is 7 years old. Throughout the whole net, it can only be found on the mcmaster university webpage. It says right on the bloody webpage that they wont disclose any methods of ranking and on top of that they even go as far as to say that most other rankings will show no corellation to it whatsoever.

why would you even bother to look at that?

[22-07-2006,21:43]
Anonymous
(in reply to: Seneca > Harvard)
^ It´s a source. Until you provide a source for your own assertions you can´t complain.

I´m sure your school is fine. Any professional engineering faculty has to meet certain standards. There´s no need to pick on the schools that rejected you.

[22-07-2006,21:48]
Anonymous
(in reply to: Seneca > Harvard)
its not a source, do i have to copy and paste what i wrote a couple of posts above?
[22-07-2006,22:20]
Anonymous
(in reply to: Seneca > Harvard)
What, copy any paste "ryerson western laurentian, lakehead and ottawa all kill UofT as far as engineering goes"?

That´s the post I´d like to see sources for. It´s an assertion that runs contrary to official rankings. You can dis the Gourman report pretty easily for not releasing its methodology and the Canadian version being several years out of date. But it is the gold standard for US guidance counsellors. And unless you can say why and how those 5 universities "all kill UofT", the Gourman report trumps your musings.

You haven´t started university yet, have you?

[22-07-2006,22:25]
Anonymous
(in reply to: Seneca > Harvard)
seneca students are obviously not going to take things as serious as harvard students for harvard worked their ass off to get there, on the other hand seneca is a college full of retards that could not get into a university, not even lakehead. that is if they are studying things like business or health, if you go to college for these things you obviously could not get into a university. admit it, it´s true
[22-07-2006,23:29]
Anonymous
(in reply to: Seneca > Harvard)
you know... we arent actually arguing about senica vs harvard.....
[23-07-2006,00:50]
Anonymous



Canadian Universities Forum at Canada City Web Site | Start Home Based Business in Canada | Canadian and International FLP Business